Dissolution Testing: A Critical Tool for Modern Pharmaceutical Development

03 November 2026

Back to the blog >

In this post

In pharmaceutical development, the ultimate goal is not simply to manufacture a tablet or capsule that meets specification, but to consistently deliver the intended therapeutic effect to patients. Among the analytical tools available to scientists, dissolution testing remains one of the most powerful techniques for understanding how a drug product is likely to behave once administered.

Historically, dissolution testing was viewed primarily as a quality control requirement, used to demonstrate batch-to-batch consistency during manufacturing. Today, however, the role of dissolution has expanded significantly. Regulatory agencies increasingly recognise dissolution testing as a valuable tool for understanding product performance, supporting formulation development, establishing clinically relevant specifications, and even predicting in vivo behaviour.

As pharmaceutical products become more complex and development timelines become increasingly compressed, incorporating dissolution testing early in development has become an essential strategy for reducing risk and accelerating product progression.

What is Dissolution Testing?

Dissolution testing measures the rate and extent to which an active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) is released from a dosage form into a dissolution medium under controlled laboratory conditions.

For oral solid dosage forms such as tablets and capsules, dissolution is often one of the most critical steps that determines drug absorption. If a drug is not released appropriately from its formulation, it cannot become available for absorption across the gastrointestinal tract, regardless of the potency of the active ingredient.

Using standardised apparatus described within the United States Pharmacopeia (USP) and European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.), dissolution profiles can be generated that characterise product performance across a range

of physiological conditions. These data provide valuable insight into formulation robustness, manufacturing consistency, and potential bioavailability.

Dissolution Beyond Quality Control

While dissolution testing remains a cornerstone of quality control, its value extends far beyond routine release testing.

During formulation development, dissolution testing enables scientists to:

  • Compare prototype formulations.
  • Assess the impact of excipient selection.
  • Investigate particle size effects.
  • Evaluate manufacturing process changes.
  • Support formulation optimisation.
  • Identify potential performance risks before clinical studies.

Early dissolution investigations can reveal significant differences between formulations that may not be evident from conventional physicochemical testing alone. This information can guide development decisions before substantial resources have been committed.

For example, changes in granulation methodology, compression force, or excipient grade may have little impact on assay or content uniformity results while significantly affecting dissolution performance. Identifying such effects early can prevent costly delays during later development stages.

Growing Regulatory Focus on Dissolution

Regulatory expectations around dissolution testing have evolved considerably over the past decade.

Authorities including the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), European Medicines Agency (EMA), and International Council for Harmonisation (ICH) increasingly promote science-based approaches that utilise dissolution data throughout the product lifecycle.

A key area of focus has been the development of clinically relevant dissolution methods and specifications. Rather than demonstrating only that a product passes an arbitrary dissolution criterion, regulators now encourage the use of dissolution methods that discriminate between meaningful formulation or process changes and that provide insight into potential in vivo performance.

The emergence of Quality by Design (QbD) frameworks has further strengthened the role of dissolution testing. Within QbD, dissolution is frequently identified as a critical quality attribute (CQA) and is often used to assess the impact of critical material attributes (CMAs) and critical process parameters (CPPs).

Consequently, dissolution data are increasingly used to support:

  • Formulation selection.
  • Manufacturing process development.
  • Control strategy establishment.
  • Specification setting.
  • Regulatory submissions.
  • Post-approval change management.

Organisations that develop scientifically justified dissolution methods early in development are often better positioned to navigate regulatory interactions and product lifecycle challenges.

Dissolution as a Biopredictive Tool

One of the most significant developments in pharmaceutical science has been the growing emphasis on biopredictive dissolution testing.

Traditional quality control dissolution methods are designed primarily for reproducibility and robustness. Although these methods are essential for routine testing, they do not always reflect conditions encountered within the human gastrointestinal tract.

Biopredictive dissolution methods seek to bridge this gap by incorporating physiologically relevant conditions, including:

  • Biorelevant media compositions.
  • Dynamic pH environments.
  • Physiologically representative agitation conditions.
  • Fed and fasted state assessments.
  • Absorption-related considerations.

When combined with physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modelling, dissolution data can contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of in vivo drug performance.

This approach is particularly valuable for:

  • Poorly soluble compounds.
  • Modified release formulations.
  • Complex generic products.
  • Drug products seeking biowaiver opportunities.
  • Formulations with known absorption limitations.

As regulators continue to promote model-informed drug development approaches, high-quality dissolution data are becoming increasingly important in demonstrating product understanding and supporting regulatory decision-making.

Why Early Dissolution Assessment Creates Value

Despite the recognised importance of dissolution testing, many development programmes delay comprehensive dissolution assessment until later stages.

This approach can create significant challenges.

Method development conducted late in the programme often encounters issues such as:

  • Limited discriminatory power.
  • Excessive method variability.
  • Inadequate understanding of formulation behaviour.
  • Difficulty establishing clinically relevant specifications.
  • Increased regulatory scrutiny.

By contrast, early dissolution assessment enables development teams to build a stronger scientific foundation from the outset.

Conducting exploratory dissolution studies during formulation screening can help identify performance trends, understand release mechanisms, and establish initial method parameters. As development progresses, this knowledge can be leveraged to create robust methods that remain fit for purpose throughout the product lifecycle.

Early assessment also allows organisations to generate valuable historical data that can support future investigations, specification setting activities, and regulatory interactions.

Perhaps most importantly, early dissolution studies can identify formulation liabilities before significant investment has been made in scale-up, validation, and regulatory submissions.

Supporting Smarter Development Decisions

In today’s pharmaceutical environment, dissolution testing should not be viewed merely as a regulatory obligation. Instead, it should be regarded as a strategic development tool capable of generating critical insights into product performance.

The industry’s increasing focus on clinically relevant dissolution, Quality by Design principles, and model-informed drug development ensures that dissolution testing will continue to play an expanding role throughout the pharmaceutical lifecycle.

For development organisations seeking to accelerate programmes, reduce technical risk, and strengthen regulatory confidence, incorporating dissolution assessment at the earliest stages of formulation development can provide a significant advantage.

At Biowaived, we believe that dissolution testing is most valuable when applied proactively. Early-stage dissolution assessment can help developers understand formulation behaviour sooner, support informed development decisions, and establish `the foundations for robust, scientifically justified dissolution methods that remain effective throughout product commercialisation.

Written By

Biopharmaceutics Blog

Dissolution Testing: A Critical Tool for Modern Pharmaceutical Development

November 3, 2026

03 November 2026

Biowaived enters a strategic partnership with Certara to enhance biopharmaceutics capabilities

March 19, 2025

Certara, Inc. (Nasdaq: CERT), a global leader in model-informed drug

Biowaived are looking for analytical scientist

February 13, 2025

Biowaived are looking for an analytical scientist to join our

Start The Conversation

01

Discussion to understand your project

02

Agree on a proposal to address the key risks

03

Deliver the data with expert interpretation and inform your go-forward strategy

Aaron brings a solid foundation of analytical expertise from academia and industry to his position at Biowaived.

He earned his master’s degree in biotechnology from the University of Kent in 2016. His professional career began at Eurofins Lancaster Laboratories, where he was responsible for assessing solid dosage form characteristics in support of formulation development.

Aaron later joined Pfizer Analytical Research and Development in Sandwich where he specialised in dissolution design and analytical method development. He had leading roles in implementing initiatives to enhance operational efficiency to reduce overall work-in-progress during formulation development and in supporting project teams with regulatory filings. In this role, he gained valuable experience of in vitro drug product performance in relation to pharmaceutical quality.

As Chief Compliance Officer, Aaron is dedicated to positioning Biowaived as a trustworthy entity in its field, ensuring that the organization not only meets regulatory standards but also builds a reputation for integrity and reliability in its operations.

Mike is set to become the Chief Technology Officer at Biowaived. He holds a degree in Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences from the University of Sunderland and is an RSC Chartered Chemist, bringing with him 28 years of experience from GSK and Pfizer, where he developed a keen interest in advanced analytical technologies.

During his early career, Mike spent 14 years in Research Formulation at Pfizer, where he not only assisted with pre-formulation and physicochemical profiling activities, but also led the execution of multiple fully integrated automation projects, encompassing kinetic, thermodynamic, and BCS solubility as well as Caco-2 absorption screens.

He subsequently joined Drug Product Design at Pfizer where he spent several years leading cross functional teams during the late-stage development of two novel parenteral projects.

Over the past decade, Mike has dedicated himself to the field of Materials Science at Pfizer, displaying an elevated level of technical expertise and a strong analytical approach to problem solving. This combination has empowered him to effectively lead multidisciplinary teams, both within the organisation and externally, in the investigation of intrinsic and extrinsic particulates identified during drug product development.

Kieran brings over a decade of experience in pharmaceutical analysis to his role as Chief Operating Officer at Biowaived.

He holds a Master’s degree in Chemistry from the University of Surrey and began his career at the British Pharmacopeia Commission Laboratory, where he developed his analytical skillset, testing a vast array of products and developing pharmaceutical monographs.

Following this, Kieran joined Pfizer and gained considerable experience in pharmaceutical development from early product design stages through to regulatory submission. Through a focused commitment to studying dissolution, he developed a deep understanding of drug product performance and the importance of dissolution testing; not only to ensure the quality of medicines but also to predict in vivo performance.

Kieran advocates for continuous improvement and adaptability, believing that focus on mentorship, collaboration and productivity can create a dynamic and responsive work environment. He enjoys new challenges and implementing strategies to streamline processes.

Inese joins Biowaived as the Chief Executive Officer, bringing with her experience from both academic and industrial settings.

During her Master’s and PhD studies in physical chemistry at the University of Latvia, she developed a strong fascination with molecular processes. This foundation has proven helpful in her subsequent work within the biopharmaceutics field, where understanding the physicochemical properties of drug compounds is crucial for drug product bioperformance.

Over the course of her career in the pharmaceutical industry, Inese has worked on modelling techniques that extract insights from experimental data, thereby facilitating drug product development. While at Pfizer’s Drug Product Development group, she worked on integrating the knowledge of material properties with in vitro study outcomes to forecast the performance of drug products. Inese aims to harness her passion for innovative solutions to position Biowaived as a trusted partner for pharmaceutical companies in need of biopharmaceutical expertise.

Dr Mark McAllister is a Pharmacy graduate from Queen’s University Belfast and has a pharmaceutics PhD from Aston University which focused on liposomal delivery to the lung for the treatment of cystic fibrosis infections. 

Mark has 30 years industrial development experience and has specialised in oral delivery systems and biopharmaceutics through roles with Hoechst-Roussel, GlaxoSmithKline and most recently as a Senior Director and Head of Global Biopharmaceutics, part of the Drug Product Design group at Pfizer in Sandwich, Kent. 

Mark was the Pfizer drug product lead for Lorlatinib, an accelerated small molecule treatment for NSCLC, commercialised as Lorviqua in the EU and Lorbrena in USA/Canada/Japan. He is a former chair of the Academy of Pharmaceutical Sciences and is currently a visiting lecturer at King’s College London. 

Mark co-led the IMI ‘OrBiTo’ biopharmaceutics project, an academic/industrial collaboration, focused on the development of the next generation of models to predict oral absorption and he currently participates in a number of pre-competitive research programmes including COLOTAN, AGePOP and InPharma Marie Skłodowska-Curie innovative training networks. 

Mark is a Fellow of the Royal Pharmaceutical Society and the Academy of Pharmaceutical Sciences. Mark is a co-author on more than 60 peer-reviewed publications and book chapter contributions, multiple patents and invited presentations and 50 poster presentations.